Britain faces a second summer write off, experts warn

Britain faces a second summer write off: Travel firms, wedding venues, pubs, and event organisers warn uncertainty over when Covid rules will end – if EVER – means hundreds of thousands of jobs and businesses will go

  • Travel expert Paul Charles said he expects some countries will still block Britons
  • It comes as millions of Britons have already booked holidays ahead of reopening
  • But government figures hint coronavirus measures could last well into summer
  • Jonathan Van Tam said ‘elaborate plans for summer’ more likely to be cancelled

Travel and hospitality bosses today warn the UK faces a second summer write off as uncertainty over when restrictions will end squashes demand for holidays and social venues.

Millions of Britons have already booked trips ahead of the Prime Minister’s announcement of the country’s plan for easing restrictions on February 22 and Matt Hancock has previously predicted a ‘Great British Summer’.

But several government figures are hinting coronavirus restrictions could last well into summer – despite fears it will spell the death knell for businesses across the UK when the furlough scheme ends on April 30.

Matt Hancock indicated today tough border measures – including quarantine hotels – will need to be in place until vaccines have been tweaked to deal with variant strains in the Autumn.

It came after Jonathan Van Tam said yesterday the ‘more elaborate your plans are for summer holidays, in terms of crossing borders, in terms of household mixing’ the greater the risk they will be cancelled.

Meanwhile SAGE expert Professor Sir Ian Boyd predicted social distancing measures will be needed for a ‘long time to come — perhaps several years.’


Matt Hancock (left) indicated today that tough border measures including quarantine hotels will need to be in place until vaccines have been tweaked to deal with variant strains in the Autumn. It came after Jonathan Van Tam (right) said yesterday the ‘more elaborate your plans are for summer holidays, in terms of crossing borders, in terms of household mixing’ the greater the risk they will be cancelled

Paul Charles, CEO of travel consultancy firm the PC Agency, said the government needs to signal restrictions will be diluted from the start of April so travel can recover.

He said ‘The government needs to signal that these tougher restrictions will be diluted from the start of April, enabling travel to recover again.

‘Otherwise, the huge drop in travellers and number of flights will push the sector over a cliff-edge, with the resulting hundreds of thousands of job losses and business failures.’

Nicky Kelvin, from Points Guy UK travel experts, said people may want to save the stress of seeing if their holiday goes ahead or not by not booking.

The beleaguered hospitality industry also has pressing questions about when trade can resume, calling on the government to give a ‘strong signal’ Britain will be open in the summer.

UK hospitality chief executive Kate Nicholls said: ‘We hope that the government will give a strong signal that Britain will be open this summer, so that businesses can begin to make preparations.

We can’t downplay how serious this has been for our sector. Businesses are telling us that only one in five have enough cash flow to last past the end of this month.

‘We have suffered over 600,000 job losses and we still have more than one million staff on furlough. Lots of businesses have gone under, but many have persevered doggedly throughout the crisis.

Meanwhile wedding experts are advising people to postpone their nuptials untilnext year so they can have the ceremony they want – free of tight restrictions.

And the festival industry – which saw most events called off or moved online last year – is trying to find ways to hold shows this year but has called for clarity from the government.

Fresh figures also show consumer confidence is plummeting, with retail sales in January falling at their fastest pace since May and only 40 per cent of Britons saying they are confident in their job security.

Matthew Fell, CBI Chief UK Policy Director, said: ‘Business understands the priority is to protect the health of the population, and supports measures to reduce infections and hasten the return to a normal way of life.

‘Yet these new quarantine rules and testing requirements are a further reminder of just how challenging the situation is for the international travel sector right now.

‘Further, immediate support is now essential to protect companies and jobs in the aviation sector and its supply chains in the difficult months ahead. The government should also be clear on a roadmap to relaxing restrictions when health data permits.

It comes despite new figures reveal that while the second wave of coronavirus in the UK hit a peak in the third week of January, cases and deaths are now in rereat, particularly in the capital.

There are early signs the tide of Covid fatalities had turned before the end of January – roughly three weeks after infections also dipped.

London saw its deaths involving the virus drop by 10 per cent, or 135 deaths, from 1,400 the week before to 1,265 in the previous week.

Conservative former minister Mark Harper – part of the lockdown sceptic CRG group of MPs – questioned when the policy against the virus was going to end, noting if the virus keeps mutating there would have to be lockdowns forever.

Travel

Mr Charles, CEO of travel consultancy firm the PC Agency, said he expects even when travel is allowed countries will still block Britons without a negative Covid test.

He told MailOnline: ‘The outlook may seem cloudy right now, as government tightens restrictions for those entering the UK.

‘But, when infection and mortality rates are much lower and the NHS is not under pressure due to vaccines taking effect, then there is no reason for such measures to be in place.

‘So, I would still expect travel to short-haul Europe to be likely from 1st May onwards and that’s when consumers should be booking for.

‘Some countries will still no doubt insist on negative test proof but travel should very much open up further.

‘This will enable people to visit family again and travel on business, as well as for holidays.’

He added: ‘The government needs to signal that these tougher restrictions will be diluted from the start of April, enabling travel to recover again.

‘Otherwise, the huge drop in travellers and number of flights will push the sector over a cliff-edge, with the resulting hundreds of thousands of job losses and business failures.’

Millions of Britons have already booked holidays (pictured, Barcelona last year) ahead of the Prime Minister’s announcement of the country’s plan for easing restrictions on February 22 and Matt Hancock has previously predicted a ‘Great British Summer’

Mr Kelvin, from Points Guy UK travel experts, said people may want to try their luck and book a holiday now due to reduced prices.

He said: ‘You might want to save the stress of worrying whether you will be able to take your trip or not, but that doesn’t mean it’s a blanket no on making future bookings.

‘One huge reason to book now is to take advantage of some of the incredible deals available. We may never see such great offers again.

‘However there are a number of important things to consider. Aim to book much later in the year (a spring trip or even early summer trip might be unlikely to happen).

‘Be sure to ensure all bookings are fully refundable or flexible and that you have adequate insurance.

‘Finally, book with ATOL or ABTA protected companies (for packages) where relevant and make bookings on a credit card to ensure you a fully protected in case the company you have booked with goes bust.’

Matthew Fell, CBI Chief UK Policy Director, said: ‘Business understands the priority is to protect the health of the population, and supports measures to reduce infections and hasten the return to a normal way of life.

‘Yet these new quarantine rules and testing requirements are a further reminder of just how challenging the situation is for the international travel sector right now.

‘Further, immediate support is now essential to protect companies and jobs in the aviation sector and its supply chains in the difficult months ahead.

‘The government should also be clear on a roadmap to relaxing restrictions when health data permits.

‘The UK’s world-class aviation sector – which underpins so much of our economic activity – must be supported so that it can play its full part in the country’s recovery.’

Meanwhile Mark Jit, a professor of vaccine epidemiology at the London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, told Wired: ‘I don’t anticipate getting on a plane or even a long distance train.’

And Clare Wenham, assistant professor of global health policy at London School of Economics, added: ‘I think we will probably be considering UK holidays this summer again.’

She added: ‘I imagine it will be more similar to last summer rather than a normal summer.’

Despite lockdown, 2.8million bookings have already been made with TUI for later in the year and the travel agent confirmed plans to operate at 80 per cent capacity.

Average daily bookings in January are up 70 per cent compared with December, although Tui said it expects a peak booking period is still on its way.

Holidaymakers are expected to wait to see if Covid-19 vaccination programmes are successful, leading to bookings for the summer – including amendments and voucher re-bookings, down 44 per cent compared with summer 2019.

The company added there will be ‘significant upside anticipated’ should restrictions lift in time for Easter.

A spokesman said: ‘Our focus on the end-to-end delivery of safe holidays already resulted in the successful partial recommencement of operations during Summer 2020.

‘Destinations have recognised this strength of Tui’s, as the governments of Greece and the Balearics selected Tui to implement pilot programmes in summer 2020 aimed at restarting tourism in their regions.

‘Our strong customer base and scale gives us an advantage in terms of brand awareness and distribution, securing attractive terms from suppliers, and in gaining greater insight into customer behaviour.

‘In addition, selling into a range of source markets helps to diversify our customer base, meaning we are not reliant on a single market.’

But England’s deputy chief medical officer put a spanner in the works yesterday by warning prospective holidaymakers not to book elaborate vacations.

Professor Van-Tam said he could not give a proper answer on holidays away from the UK as the data was not available.

Speaking at the No 10 news briefing, he said: ‘The more elaborate your plans are for summer holidays, in terms of crossing borders, in terms of household mixing, given where we are now, I think we just have to say the more you are stepping into making guesses about the unknown.

‘I can’t give people a proper answer at this point because we don’t yet have the data. It’s just too early.’

Currently Britons are not allowed to leave the country unless they have a legally permitted reason.

Work trips are allowed, so you will have to show some proof that your flight or sea crossing is vital for your employment.

But there are a range of other reasons for ‘essential travel’, such as medical care, to escape harm, compassionate visits – for example a funeral – and weddings.

Meanwhile airlines fear any lack of rooms under the quarantine hotels scheme could force them to leave travellers stuck abroad.

It is understood ministers are considering adding a section to passenger locator forms, which all must fill out before departure.

It could ask them if they have booked into a quarantine hotel in the UK. But it is unclear if carriers will have to bar travellers who answer no, leaving them stranded.

Prices soar in wealthy staycation hotspots

Prices are soaring for staycation locations as rich Britons look to cash in on the best trip at home money can buy.

One that might just catch their eye is a two-week break for a family of four – at a mere £600,000.

Among the enviable holidays on offer is a tour of Scotland on board the privately chartered luxury train the Belmond Royal Scotsman, which comprises nine en suite carriages and a spa.

The tour, offered by travel firm Abercrombie & Kent, includes excursions such as seats in the royal box at the Royal Edinburgh Military Tattoo in August (if it goes ahead); the chance to ‘brush shoulders with the Queen’ at the Braemar Gathering (again, if it is held) and VIP access to golf courses graced by celebrities, including Carnoustie and St Andrews’ Old Course.

The tour is followed by seven days on the Glamis Castle estate, home of the late Queen Mother and the setting for Macbeth.

The stay comes with a programme of country pursuits, a tennis session with Sir Andy Murray and mini-versions of West End shows, performed by original cast members. The cost is ‘from £600,000’ for a family of four.

Meanwhile, the Oetker Collection markets a range of ‘the most fabulous private homes and castles’, with hosts such as James Middleton, brother of the Duchess of Cambridge, who works at the Glen Affric estate in Inverness-shire. Oetker can put you and your party of up to 20 in all-inclusive luxury at Glen Affric for £35,000 a week. Activities include kayaking, shooting and a ceilidh.

Mr Middleton, 33, is billed as ‘a charming host who will delight in helping you make the most of these magical destinations’.

But people with significant sums to spend on such vacations will have to book soon to avoid disappointment – some firms are warning that availability for some bespoke luxury holidays is ‘very tight’.

 

Mr Hancock will announce today the Government has struck its first deals with hotel chains to accommodate those quarantining.

Ministers are expected to unveil a booking system for travellers this week.

But an aviation source said yesterday: ‘We’re completely in the dark. We don’t know yet whether the Government will want us to deny boarding.’

Airlines are legally required to check that passenger locator forms have been completed.

They also have to check that a passenger has a negative Covid test taken within 72 hours of travel. Ministers have been accused of being too slow to bring in quarantine hotels.

The policy was announced in the Commons on January 27 but does not come into force until Monday.

Under the rules, hotels will have to provide three meals a day for guests for 11 nights. Travellers will be tested twice, on the second and eighth day of their stay.

Security guards will be stationed on each floor and by entrances and exits, with police on standby if passengers try to abscond.

Toughened measures to prevent imported coronavirus variants gaining a foothold in the UK will also be set out by ministers, with extra testing for international arrivals.

People isolating at home will be told they must get a test two and eight days into their 10-day quarantine period, with Health Secretary Matt Hancock expected to give further details in the Commons.

The Department of Health and Social Care said the move was designed to provide a ‘further level of protection’ enabling the authorities to track new cases better.

It comes after it was confirmed last week that UK nationals returning from 33 ‘red list’ countries would be required to quarantine in closely monitored Government-designated hotels, where they would have to take two tests – although no contracts have yet been signed with accommodation providers.

Tory former minister Mr Harper told the Commons today: ‘When is this policy going to end, if ever? Because if the virus continues to mutate, surely the risk is going to be there forever and so when can it be removed?’

Mr Hancock responded: ‘The risk of mutations absolutely can and will be managed through the evolution of vaccines in the way that the annual flu jab changes each year and allows us to protect ourselves.

‘Of course these measures, whilst necessary now, are not measures that can be in place permanently. We need to replace them over time with a system of safe and free international travel. That’s where we need to get to.

‘The first task is to vaccinate the population. If we get good news on the vaccination impact on hospitalisations and deaths from people who have new mutations, then we will be in a better place. If we do not get such good news, then we will need to use the updated vaccines to protect against the variants of concerns.

‘The scientists inform and advise me that there are repeatedly independently around the world mutations of the same type in the E484K area of the virus, as mentioned by (Jonathan Ashworth). Now that gives the scientists a good start in where to target the new updated vaccine.’

The Financial Times reported ministers were said to be close to signing up a series of hotels near Heathrow, and were optimistic of agreeing deals with others around Manchester, Gatwick, Birmingham and London City airports.

The extra testing burden – with the cost expected to fall on travellers – has added to concerns in the travel industry.

Derek Jones, chief executive of luxury travel company Kuoni, welcomed the plan to test arriving travellers but called for it to coincide with an easing of mandatory self-isolation requirements.

He said: ‘A robust testing regime is the way to open up travel again but it has to replace or at least shorten quarantine. That’s the way to get travel moving again.’

But SAGE expert Professor Sir Ian has predicted social distancing measures will be needed for a ‘long time to come — perhaps several years.’

The infectious disease expert at the St Andrews University, said the emergence of potentially jab-resistant strains means the UK could be stuck in a pattern of ‘control and release for a long time to come’.

Evidence suggests the Oxford University vaccine – the main weapon in Britain’s arsenal to combat the virus –  does not stop people falling ill with the South African variant, which is feared to be spreading in the community already. But No10’s top scientific advisers believe it still protects against severe illness and death.

Professor Sir Ian and several other prominent SAGE members warned reopening the shutdown too early could risk allowing new, equally concerning variants to spawn.

Mutations randomly happen as viruses spread but most changes never change the way it looks or behaves.

Very high transmission gives the virus more opportunity to mutate and, therefore, drives up the risk that one of the alterations could change the course of the disease.

Professor Sir Ian told The Times: ‘It stands to reason that the more people there are in the population with infections — the prevalence — the more virus that is replicating and the more chance there is of even highly improbable mutations happening.’

He warned even if Britain gets on top of the South African strain, there will be more concerning ones down the line.

He added: ‘My suspicion is that we will experience a damped oscillation of control-release for a long time to come — perhaps several years.’

Pubs

The threat of continued lockdown has also spurred fears pubs may not be open until late in the year.

UKHospitality Chief Executive Kate Nicholls said the industry hopes to reopen from the start of April but notes there are caveats with this.

She said: ‘The rapid roll-out of the vaccine gives us good reason to be positive that we are on the road back to normality.

‘We are hopeful that we can begin to see a gradual reopening of hospitality from the start of April.

‘Obviously, this is likely to be heavily dependent on health metrics, such as the number of vaccinations and new cases, continuing their positive trends.’

She added: ‘We will know more about what is going to be achievable on 22 February, but we are confident that people can begin to look at events and holidays this summer.

‘We hope that the government will give a strong signal that Britain will be open this summer, so that businesses can begin to make preparations. We must remember that reopening after a shut-down like this takes a lot of time, effort and money.’

It is not yet clear when they will reopen, but the Prime Minister is due to unveil his long-awaited road map ‘to unlock’ Britain on February 22.

UKHospitality Chief Executive Kate Nicholls said the industry hopes to reopen from the start of April but notes there are caveats with this. Pictured: Borough Market in September

Ministers are expected to adopt a ‘tentative’ approach – with some sources claiming a ‘booze ban’ on pubs between April and May was being considered to stop social distancing slipping.

But a senior Government source told MailOnline an alcohol ban in pubs was not on the cards.

They said: ‘We are not going to open pubs that can’t sell booze. What would be the point of that?’

Labour’s shadow minister for business and consumers, Lucy Powell, described the suggestion as ‘ridiculous’.

She told BBC Breakfast: ‘They (businesses) need to know the economic support that will sit alongside the public health measures. At the moment they diverge quite considerably.

‘And we need to make sure for businesses that that route map to reopening allows businesses to open in a viable way.

‘So we can’t have ridiculous things that we’ve seen speculated about with pubs saying they can reopen but without serving alcohol, for example.’

Other measures being floated include axing the 10pm curfew – which has been given the go-ahead according to some reports, along with an end to the requirement for drinkers to order a ‘substantial meal’ with alcohol.

England could also emulate Scotland’s indoor alcohol ban – where pubs are able to serve booze but only in outdoor areas – that was in effect during its November lockdown, and allow unlicensed cafes to reopen while keeping pubs closed.

One idea is for pubs to be permitted to sell takeaway pints from April before fully reopening in May, the Sun reported.

The PM also tasked officials with ‘simplifying’ the rules for pubs, paving the way for the 10pm curfew to be ditched along with the requirement to order a ‘substantial meal’ with food.

A Government source said: ‘As the pandemic has changed in the past year we have always tried to adapt the rules to make them more effective and easier to understand. As we look to cautiously unlock, we will seek to do the same again.’

Another source added: ‘There is a hope to not get bogged down in ‘scotch egg-gate’ again, by effectively simplifying the rules to avoid confusion.’

Limiting indoor mixing is expected to be central to the Government’s strategy and venues will be encouraged to promote al fresco dining. 

Landlords are desperate to welcome back customers after months shuttered during the crisis.

Pubs have had to throw away up to 87million pints of beer since the start of the pandemic, an industry body claimed.

The British Beer and Pub Association said the waste was equal to £331million in sales, and warned of job losses without more Government support.

Weddings

Meanwhile experts have reviewed advice for weddings for the summer, with some suggesting postponing them.

The Guides for Brides website suggests postponing your wedding this year, especially if you do not want to get married under tight restrictions.

It warns those looking to get hitched in the first few months of 2021 ‘are likely facing the reality that it will not be the day you have dreamed of’. 

But the website said people should check all their options before they decide to cancel the event.

It adds: ‘Many are also choosing to move their larger celebrations until they are safe to go ahead.

‘This way they can properly celebrate their marriage with their wider friends and family. This approach is known as a sequel wedding.’

Many venues are asking their customers to pay more to move date, sometimes due to the new date being more popular – for example, summer and weekend dates.

Henrietta Dunkley, associate solicitor at Ellis Jones Solicitors, said: ‘The venue may well be taking this approach because at the moment it is hoped that weddings will be able to take place in September 2021.

‘This is based on the Prime Minister’s recent comments to the wedding industry that couples should ”plan with confidence” because we should be in ”different world” by summer 2021.

‘The coronavirus pandemic has not yet affected weddings in September 2021 and so the venue are entitled to treat your contract with them as such.

‘It is generally normal for wedding venues to increase their prices slightly each year, but they cannot just hike up prices unreasonably.’

Experts have reviewed advice for weddings for the summer, with some suggesting postponing them. Pictured: A wedding in Northumberland last year

She added it is worth checking the contract in place with the venue to determine whether there is a contractual entitlement to increase the price of a wedding in certain circumstances.

Whether the new price is unreasonable will likely depend on the terms of the contract and how much the original price has increased by.

Adam French, consumer expert at Which?, added: ‘You shouldn’t have to pay more if the rescheduled wedding is a comparable date and service.

‘If you can’t agree on a new date, they are entitled to a refund providing the wedding can’t go ahead as initially planned, according to the Competition and Markets Authority’s guidance.’

The CMA has set up a taskforce to investigate harmful pricing practices during the pandemic and has created a form that consumers can complete if they feel a business has treated them unfairly.

It comes as consumer spending in the retail sector slid in January as the latest national lockdown hammered shops across the UK, according to new figures.

The BRC-KPMG retail sales monitor for the month showed a slump in total sales, while a separate report from Barclaycard has revealed the sharpest fall in consumer spending since May.

The British Retail Consortium (BRC) revealed that total retail sales fell by 1.3 per cent in January as rapid online growth failed to entirely offset the plunge in store sales.

Over the three months to January, sales of non-food items in stores dived by 36.5 per cent as retailers were heavily impacted by the January lockdown.

Total non-food sales were 5.6 per cent lower for the period as online clothing and homeware sales only partially offset closures.

Meanwhile, food sales jumped by 7.9 per cent for the three-month period as grocery stores remained open to shoppers.

Helen Dickinson, chief executive of the BRC, said: ‘January saw retail sales growth decline to its lowest level since May of last year.

‘The current lockdown has hit non-essential retailers harder than in November, with the new variant hampering consumer confidence and leading customers to hold back on spending – especially on clothing and footwear.

‘Meanwhile, retailers have worked incredibly hard to expand their online delivery and click and collect offerings to ensure everyone can get the products they need during lockdown.

‘This has led to record growth for online non-food sales and is a testament to the resilience and innovation of retail, which in the face of the pandemic, has rapidly adapted and invested in online platforms and delivery logistics.’

Paul Martin, UK head of retail at KPMG, said: ‘Computing was the hot category and saw triple figure growth online as schools closed and parents rushed to purchase laptops and printers.

‘Meanwhile, clothing retailers continued to struggle with physical sales down across all categories.’

A separate report by Barclaycard revealed that consumer spending slumped by 16.3 per cent in January, representing the sharpest decline since May in the face of the latest lockdown.

The analysis of credit and debit card spending showed that shoppers spent almost-a-quarter less on non-essential items against the same period last year amid store closures.

Not-essential spending in January fell by 24.2 per cent, with department store retailers witnessing a 36.8 per cent sales slump while clothing sales were 25 per cent lower.

Meanwhile, the report said that sales of essential items grew 3.9 per cent as high demand for home deliveries sparked a 126.8 per cent surge in online grocery spending.

Shoppers spent significantly less booking holidays in January, with a 87.2 per cent fall in travel agent sales with airlines reporting an 81.6 per cent fall amid travel restrictions.

Raheel Ahmed, head of consumer products at Barclaycard, said: ‘As the impact of the latest lockdown start to take its toll, we’ve seen particular sectors struggle, as physical premises across the UK were forced to close.

‘Last month’s glimmer of hope for the travel sector also seems to have stalled as tougher border controls saw bookings drop.

‘Yet, on a more positive note, we have seen a surge in many online categories as the demand for home deliveries continues to rise.’

Social events

Another industry to have been battered by the pandemic is that of events and festivals.

A swathe of popular events have already been cancelled this year – such as Glastonbury – and others are unsure of how or if they will go ahead.

For live shows such as festivals and sports, crowds play a large part – contributing to the atmosphere and bringing in cash for companies.

There are plans in motion by many organisations to keep their gatherings going in some form this year no matter the restrictions on movement.

Wimbledon has said it will still hold the championships but is expecting it to have to be with a reduced-capacity crowd.

A statement said: ‘Our aspiration is to stage the best Championships possible – a trusted, best practice, safe event – with the health and safety of all guests, staff and competitors remaining our highest priority.

‘With five months remaining until the Championships, we are continuing to develop our detailed scenario planning and work closely with the relevant government and public health authorities to keep abreast of the latest developments in the fight against coronavirus.

‘The majority of our planning focus is currently centred on the option of a reduced-capacity Championships and how that would affect each stakeholder group, but we are not yet in a position to rule out any of the other scenarios.’

Another industry to have been battered by the pandemic is that of events and festivals. Pictured: The Edinburgh Fringe Festival in 2012

Meanwhile Notting Hill Carnival, which attracts throngs of people to the upmarket west London street, said there will be efforts to try to run Europe’s biggest street party ‘in some way’ this year.

Matthew Phillip, chief executive of Notting Hill Carnival Ltd, said social distancing would be ‘devastating’ for the event.

Mr Phillip told MPs on the Digital, Culture, Media and Sport Committee, which is looking at the cultural and economic impact on the UK’s music festivals: ‘For Carnival weekend specifically, it would pose a very big problem.

‘It would be very difficult to hold Carnival in its traditional format on the streets with social distancing in place. It would be devastating for a second year in a row.’

Asked if it would mean cancellation of the August event in west London, Mr Phillip said ‘yes’ – but added efforts would be made to try and run it in some way.

He added: ‘It would not take place in its traditional format. We would always hope to do something.

‘Carnival means too much to too many people for us to simply ignore it so we would always try to find a way of celebrating Carnival for its artistry and what it means to the community.’

Another event under threat is the Chelsea Flower Show, with its normally colourful delights of late spring, set to turn brown as it moves to the autumn months.

For the first time in its 109-year history, the event will take place later in the year – meaning the vibrant displays of mid-May will be replaced by the more mellow tones of the fall.

The Royal Horticultural Society (RHS) announced last month the show, in the grounds of the Royal Hospital Chelsea, has been moved from May 18-23 to September 21-26.

Last year the event had to be scrapped completely because of coronavirus, with a virtual show staged online.

RHS director general Sue Biggs said: ‘In these challenging times, we have always followed Government advice and made difficult, responsible decisions with the health and safety of people our key concern.

‘Whilst we are sad to have had to delay RHS Chelsea, and are sorry for the disruption this will cause, we are excited that we are still planning to bring the world’s best-loved gardening event to the nation.’

And the organiser of the Henley Royal Regatta and Henley Festival in Oxfordshire said she is planning for the popular five-day boat racing event at the end of June to be ‘near normal’ this year.

Jo Bausor said they are due to revise their decision on the event at the end of February or start of March depending on government guidance.

She told the Henley Standard: ‘We definitely will have an event this year, no matter what. At the moment we’re still planning for a near normal event, as much as we can.

‘This does depend on the regatta and what they decide to do. We’re working very closely with them and have a very good and productive relationship.’

The event usually attracts about 6,000 people but may have to reduce capacity due to social distancing.

She added: ‘It wouldn’t be the full festival but it would have all the artists and all the bits everybody knows and loves.’

Industry insiders say a festival season is ‘still possible’ this year despite the cancellation of Glastonbury due to Covid.

The chief executive of the Association of Independent Festivals, Paul Reed, said the UK’s largest festival was a ‘different beast’ and its cancellation did not mean other smaller events could not go ahead.

But he said there is only hope for smaller events if the Government ensures organisers of music events can access insurance to protect against losses as a result of Covid.

Last month, Glastonbury organisers announced the 2021 festival was cancelled because of the pandemic.

The music festival’s co-organiser, Michael Eavis – who curates the lineup with his daughter Emily – said he was ‘so sorry’ to have to cancel the event for the second year in a row.

Most live music events, including Glastonbury, were wiped out last summer by the pandemic. 

A recent study warned without state support, Britain’s £1.3billion live music industry is heading for another summer washout.

But Mr Reed believed with the right help from ministers, smaller festivals could still go ahead.  

Speaking to BBC Breakfast he said: ‘I will say about Glastonbury that it is a different beast to most festivals and most likely ran out of time due to the size and complexity of the event.

‘For most festivals the cut-off point is more likely the end of March.’

He said we are at a ‘serious point in the pandemic and festivals only want to return when it is safe to do so’. 

‘This is devastating news about Glastonbury, not least for the amount of staff and freelancers and companies involved in delivering the event, but a festival season is still possible for this year if Government act now on insurance.’

He added festivals are currently struggling to get insurance for coronavirus-related cancellations.

‘We do need Government to intervene in this issue,’ he said.

Edinburgh’s festivals face a similar threat, according to bosses who warned it is not a ‘foregone conclusion’ events will bounce back.

Director of umbrella body Festivals Edinburgh, Julia Amour, said companies which have done ‘well out of the pandemic’ should step in to help Edinburgh retain its leading culture claim.

Edinburgh’s festivals have experienced huge growth in modern times, attracting a record 4.4 million overall attendance in 2019 and generating more than £300m.

Edinburgh’s festivals have experienced huge growth in modern times, attracting a record 4.4 million overall attendance in 2019 and generating more than £300million

But heritage groups want a total rethink on how they are staged in the future to reduce their impact on the fabric of the city and cut their carbon footprint.

Ms Amour said new funding would need to be found if growing criticism about their impact on the city was to be tackled.

She said there was an ‘economic conundrum’ over how to ensure more people living in Edinburgh were able to attend the festivals as well as spread events out more around the city and across the calendar.

Speaking at an online conference hosted by the Cockburn Association heritage group, Ms Amour said: ‘We must make sure our festivals continue to feel authentically of our city.

‘But we are also an international city and a capital city. That dimension of what the festivals bring to our city is something we need to look carefully at this very perilous moment.

‘It is not a foregone conclusion that Edinburgh will be able to hang on to what we most value about our festivals.

‘We’re proud as festivals to be deeply international in spirit, but first and foremost we want to belong to the city.

‘We should not lose sight of the fact that two thirds of people in the city do take part and do see the festivals as belonging to them.

‘Yet, at the same time, one third of the population don’t access them.

‘There is an economic conundrum at the moment and if we are to get what we want, we will have to solve that conundrum.

‘People are taking their own risks and putting their own money up to come here.

‘People ask why they are so concentrated in the city centre and why they are on at the same time in the year.

‘It’s because it is a big industry event as well as a big audience event. People need to be there when programmers from other festivals are there.

‘That’s one of the benefits. But at the same time it makes it very fragile and very difficult.’

A Government spokesman said: ‘We are in regular dialogue with public health experts to agree a realistic return date for festivals and other large events.

‘Once we are confident we have this, we will be working with organisers to unlock the barriers they face to restarting – including challenges getting insurance.

‘Yesterday’s decision by the festival organisers reflects the sad fact that the public health outlook did not make it likely 200,000 people could be together without social distancing measures in just a few months’ time.

‘We are continuing to help festivals with the £1.5 billion Culture Recovery Fund, with many already receiving this support.’

Official figures show England and Wales suffered the second deadliest week of the pandemic at the end of January after coronavirus cases spiralled in the run-up to Christmas.

Office for National Statistics (ONS) data shows 8,433 people had the virus mentioned on their death certificates over the seven days to January 29. This was 11 fatalities more than the week before, the third-deadliest, when 8,422 were recorded.

Above is the proportion of fatalities triggered by the virus during the second wave of the pandemic. It shows that the highest proportion was in the most recent week, January 29, where it accounted for 45 per cent of all deaths

The week ending January 29, the latest for which data is available, was the deadliest of the pandemic, according to the ONS. It also saw the highest proportion of deaths from the virus registered since March, where they accounted for half of the total

Fatalities from all causes were above the five-year average in all regions of England and Wales, ONS data shows, which tracks how many deaths are expected in a particular week

Covid-19 was involved in almost half of deaths over the most recent week, when a total of 18,448 fatalities from all causes were recorded, the highest proportion attributed to the virus since March. 

The ONS report also showed three English regions still recorded more than 1,000 coronavirus deaths in the same week. All regions saw a week-on-week rise in Covid-19 deaths except the North East, South East and London. 

But the capital, as well as the South East and the East of England – all three of which bore the brunt of the second wave after an outbreak of the Kent variant – had four-digit fatality tolls. 

In the South East it was 1,710 deaths, down 24 from the previous week, while in the East it was 1,297, up from 81 the seven days prior. London recorded 1,265 deaths, down 135 from the previous week.

Meanwhile, 2,505 care home residents deaths also involved Covid-19 in the most recent week, which was almost a third of the total and the highest number of fatalities linked to the virus for the most vulnerable since May 1. 

The deadliest week of the pandemic was at the peak of the first wave in mid-April, when 8,758 people had Covid-19 included on their death certificates.

ONS death figures are still rising because they are recording deaths from the last month, after statisticians analyse each fatality to identify all those where the virus was mentioned.

But there are signs that deaths from Covid-19 likely peaked in England in January. There was a dip in fatalities in London, and they also plateaued in the South East and North East. PA news agency says they may have peaked on January 19, as this is when the highest figure of 1,404 deaths from the virus in 24 hours was reached

Some 2,505 care home residents died from the virus in the most recent week in all settings – which was almost a third of the total number of deaths from the disease

Those aged 85 and over accounted for the highest number of deaths from the virus, official data from the ONS shows

But the Department of Health’s daily updates show the number of deaths from the virus has now started to fall in line with nose-diving infections, suggesting ONS figures may begin to drop next week. 

There is a delay of about three weeks between someone getting infected with the virus and sadly succumbing to the disease, meaning it takes time for a dip in cases to show up in the deaths figures.

The total number of deaths from all causes registered in the week to January 29 was 44 per cent above the five-year average for the number of fatalities expected at this time of year. 

All regions in England had a higher number of deaths than average – with hotspot London worst-hit after suffering 1,144 excess deaths, double the number predicted by previous years.

But there are early signs that the tide of Covid-19 fatalities, which are driving the spike in deaths, had turned before the end of January – roughly three weeks after infections also dipped.

London saw its fatalities involving the virus drop by 10 per cent, or 135 deaths, from 1,400 the week before to 1,265 in the previous week.

And there was a plateau in the North East, where they dropped by four per cent from 279 to 269, and in the South East, where they fell by one per cent from 1,734 and 1,710.

All other regions saw a rise in the number of deaths from coronavirus.

Source: Read Full Article