King Charles ‘could renounce’ his claim on Australia

King Charles holds audience with PM Liz Truss

We use your sign-up to provide content in ways you’ve consented to and to improve our understanding of you. This may include adverts from us and 3rd parties based on our understanding. You can unsubscribe at any time. More info

Ex-Australian PM Paul Keating has made a surprising remark that King Charles could renounce his claim on Australia, a news report has stated. Calling King Charles “a constitutional aberration”, Mr Keating said Queen Elizabeth and her family hoped Australia would vote to become a republic in the 1999 referendum.

Mr Keating, 78, was in conversation with a Sydney University professor where he made the astonishing statements.

He also slammed the Australian public for not voting for a republic when the Queen “didn’t want” to hold on to Australia, saying “Australians have so little pride in themselves”.

He said: “I think the Royal Family would have been so glad for the referendum to have passed, to be honest.

“I wouldn’t be at all surprised if King Charles the Third, the King of Australia, doesn’t volunteer … to renounce his claim on Australia.”

Mr Keating said a monarch based on the other side of the world could not properly represent Australians.

He said: “’Who in their right mind could believe that the monarch of Great Britain could represent our aspirations here?

“We occupy one of the oldest land masses, the oldest continents on Earth, perhaps the oldest societies on Earth – it’s so pathetic.

“Charles the Third, King of Australia, is a constitutional aberration. That’s what it is.”

Mr Keating led the Australian government from 1991 to 1996.

According to Mail Online, during his visit to Britain in 1993, the ex-Australian PM privately discussed his hope Australia would endorse the move with Queen Elizabeth.

Mr Keating said that he told the Queen he would “not involve her family” in his campaign for Australia to have its own head of state.

Mr Keating said the Australian Republic Movement asked him to get involved with its campaign after the Queen’s death, but he did not want to.

DON’T MISS:
Fergie faced funny question at Princess Eugenie’s wedding [INSIGHT]
Netflix’s The Crown to show Diana-Charles split in ‘painful’ detail [SPOTLIGHT]
Transport for London slammed for ‘nonsense’ language guide [REVEAL]

He said: “Why would you? We fluffed it (in 1999).

“If Australians have so little pride in themselves, so little pride that they are happy to be represented by the monarch of Great Britain, why would somebody like me want to shift their miserable view of themselves?”

Source: Read Full Article