{"id":88702,"date":"2023-12-12T23:48:21","date_gmt":"2023-12-12T23:48:21","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/celebritytidings.com\/?p=88702"},"modified":"2023-12-12T23:48:21","modified_gmt":"2023-12-12T23:48:21","slug":"andrew-lloyd-webber-wins-high-court-copyright-dispute-over-song-memory-from-cats","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/celebritytidings.com\/lifestyle\/andrew-lloyd-webber-wins-high-court-copyright-dispute-over-song-memory-from-cats\/","title":{"rendered":"Andrew Lloyd Webber wins High court copyright dispute over song Memory from Cats"},"content":{"rendered":"

<\/p>\n

Philip Christian, 68, said in the 1970s that he penned the words and melody that became the main theme from the hit 1981 show Cats.<\/p>\n

He alleged that a member of one of Lord Lloyd-Webber\u2019s other works overheard a recording of the song and\u00a0recited it to him ahead of the show\u2019s production.<\/p>\n

Mr Christian was suing Lord Lloyd-Webber and lyricist Sir Trevor Nunn for breach of copyright.<\/p>\n

He claimed he owns the rights to the \u201clyrics and musical score\u201d and demanded future royalty payments.<\/p>\n

But following a High Court hearing in London last week, judge Master James Brightwell threw out the \u201cfanciful and entirely hopeless\u201d claim.<\/p>\n

Rights to the song Memory were registered to Lord Lloyd-Webber and to Sir Trevor, who shares the copyright in the words with the family of poet TS Eliot, whose work Rhapsody on a Windy Night was the inspiration.<\/p>\n

Mr Christian told the court his own song was inspired by his experience arriving in the UK aged 11 from the Dominican Republic in the 1960s.<\/p>\n

He said he was training in performance arts when a recording of his song was heard by one of Lord Lloyd-Webber\u2019s dancers.<\/p>\n

He claimed it must have been \u201cmemorised and then recited\u201d in front of the star composer.<\/p>\n

Representing himself, Mr Christian said: \u201cI have always had that tune in my head. Every time I hear it on the radio, I get angrier.\u201d<\/p>\n

Barrister Stephanie Wickenden, however, argued his copyright claim should be struck out.<\/p>\n

She said his argument the song was memorised then recited was \u201cnot a plausible allegation\u201d, adding: \u201cIf there were any merit to the claim, it would\u2019ve been brought 40 years ago.\u201d<\/p>\n